Visit tucanofulano's column >>

TUCANOFULANO

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 706
Member Since: 3/2007Last Seen: 10/21/2009

Exxon Valdez $2.5 billion oil spill ruling overturned

advertisement

By James Vicini WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out the record $2.5 billion in punitive damages that Exxon Mobil Corp had been ordered to pay for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill off Alaska, the nation's worst tanker...

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.3
{"commentId":2050258,"authorDomain":"tucanofulano"}

Here's a "hypothetical" - pay each of 5 supremes 1/5 of a billion each, and save 1.5 Billion by securing a "get out of jail free card". Possible? Probable?

{"commentId":2050258,"threadId":"299099","contentId":"1610972","authorDomain":"tucanofulano"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:00 PM EDT
{"commentId":2054312,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}

This is an outrage!, and now that the "Surpreme 9" have spoken, there is nothing anybody can do about it.

Can the oil companie be that powerful?!

Did they get to the Supreme Court Judges?!

A company with 40 Billion Dollars in one years profits....

can't and won't help American citizens whose lives they have destroyed?!

What the hell is going on??!!

{"commentId":2054312,"threadId":"299099","contentId":"1610972","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
    Reply#2 - Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:03 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2054491,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}

    Dissenting Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer would have upheld the award. They said "Congress, not the court, should set limits on punitive damages under maritime law."

    This another case where the court is "making law".

    Breyer said this was no ordinary reckless behavior case.

    RELAPSED ALCOHOLIC

    "The jury could reasonably have believed that Exxon knowingly allowed a relapsed alcoholic repeatedly to pilot a vessel filled with millions of gallons of oil through waters that provided the livelihood for the many plaintiffs in this case," he said

    By the way .... isn't this the same bunch that put George Bush, with all his oil cronies, in power?

    {"commentId":2054491,"threadId":"299099","contentId":"1610972","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
      Reply#3 - Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:21 PM EDT
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"299099","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"299099","contentId":"1610972"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking